For the people who teach the course
Stronger arguments, before they reach you.
Studiosity Writing Feedback Plus works on the thinking behind the writing: whether it answers the task, whether the argument holds, whether the claims are supported, and whether the sources earn their place. It points out what isn’t working and leaves the fixing to the student. Students can come back through several drafts before the work reaches you.
How it works
A change the student didn’t make teaches them very little.
Ask a generative tool for a paragraph and you get a paragraph. That’s useful, and it’s also why students who lean on it stop developing the skill your assessment was built to test. This does the opposite. It shows a student what isn’t working and where, and leaves the work to them.
Where the judgement comes from
Academic feedback, academic oversight
Studiosity’s model is built on more than twenty years of feedback given by academics on student writing, much of it from before generative AI. Studiosity’s Academic Advisory Board (AAB) helps guide on academic standards. Georgia State University faculty found Studiosity’s feedback largely consistent with their own evaluation of student work.
Judgement
Where it isn't established, the work comes to you.
Where a student shows they understand their work, that’s recorded. Where they don’t, the work comes to you, with the contributing factors shown, so you can see how far short it fell. We never say what a student did. We say what we couldn’t establish. What that means is your call.
The two settings
You set how much AI this assessment allows, and how much evidence it needs.
You set a different bar for a reflective journal than for a dissertation. Both decisions are pedagogical, which is why they sit with you and not with an administrator.
When you’re ready
Students self-validate their authorship, and you decide.
No percentages to interpret, and the judgement is yours.